ArticleJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2026
Development and initial validation of a brief 2-item measure of belonging among student physical therapists in the United States: a psychometric validation study.
Article in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objectives of this study were to develop a 2-item abbreviated version of the Program Sense of Belonging questionnaire (ProSBq) and to evaluate its ability to identify student physical therapists with relatively low valued competence and social acceptance.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using survey data from 634 students enrolled in physical therapist education programs across the United States. The 10-item ProSBq was used to assess 2 dimensions of belonging: valued competence and social acceptance. Principal component analysis was performed to identify representative items for each subscale, with 1 item selected per subscale. Pearson product-moment correlations were used to examine relationships between the single items and their corresponding subscale scores. Classification performance was evaluated by assessing how accurately the single-item responses classified students reporting a relatively low sense of valued competence and social acceptance, based on their full ProSBq subscale scores. Multiple single-item response thresholds were examined to assess classification accuracy.
resultsThe single items demonstrated strong relationships with their corresponding subscale scores (r=0.63-0.80, with part-whole correction). For valued competence, sensitivity increased from 53.6% to 92.9%, whereas specificity decreased from 96.3% to 73.5% when a more inclusive threshold was used. A similar sensitivity-specificity tradeoff was observed for social acceptance. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated excellent discrimination (area under the curve ≥0.90).
conclusionSingle ProSBq items demonstrated strong relationships with full valued competence and social acceptance subscale scores and acceptable classification performance. The abbreviated 2-item ProSBq may provide a practical and efficient method for identifying students experiencing low valued competence or social acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.