ArticleBMJ open2026
Testing and evaluating updated variants of the rurality index for Japan: a nationwide methodological study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychiatric standardized claim ratios by rurality and deprivation in Japan: A nationwide ecological study with contextual suicide mortality.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo update the rurality index for Japan (RIJ) using the most recent national data and to test and evaluate the updated RIJ variants that incorporate alternative distance metrics and a modified classification of remote islands, thereby providing methodological guidance for their use in research and health policy.
designNationwide methodological study.
settingJapan.
participantsAll postal code areas in Japan; analyses were aggregated into municipalities and secondary medical care areas for evaluation. EXPOSURE: Six RIJ variants ('RIJ family') constructed by combining three distance metrics (direct distance, road-based distance and travel time by car) and two island classifications (original RIJ and modified RIJ), standardised to a continuous 0-100 scale using percentile ranks. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Concordance among RIJ variants was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, quintile reclassification matrices and rank-difference analyses; convergent validity was evaluated using the national physician distribution index. Criterion-related validity was assessed using municipal-level life expectancy for men and women.
resultsAll RIJ variants had extremely high concordance (Spearman's ρ≥0.99 across all pairwise comparisons). Compared with the previous RIJ classification, >98% of the geographic units remained in the same rurality quintile and <0.3% shifted by two or more quintiles across variants. Rank-difference analyses demonstrated that large changes were geographically limited and primarily concentrated in island areas. Convergent validity with physician distribution was moderate and consistent across variants (Spearman's ρ approximately -0.52). Criterion-related validity showed weak but significant negative correlations with life expectancy, which were stronger for males (ρ ≈ -0.27 to -0.29) than for females (ρ ≈ -0.17 to -0.19). These patterns were consistent with findings from the original RIJ study. We found no descriptive evidence that the associations with external indicators differed meaningfully across RIJ variants. The 95% CIs of the correlation coefficients largely overlapped across RIJ variants, suggesting no meaningful differences in their associations.
conclusionsDespite differences in distance metrics and island classification, all RIJ variants captured highly similar underlying dimensions of rurality and demonstrated comparable validity. These findings indicate that rurality measurement in Japan is stable regardless of methodological refinements, allowing RIJ variants to be flexibly selected according to specific research or policy purposes without materially affecting conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.