SynthesisBMJ open2026
Self-management experiences and needs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential Profile of Self-Management and Associated Factors Among Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo systematically review qualitative studies on the self-management experiences and needs of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to provide evidence for developing needs-based self-management intervention strategies.
designA systematic review and meta-aggregation of qualitative studies conducted in accordance with the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research statement. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP Database and CBM were searched from database inception to March 2025 for qualitative studies on COPD self-management experiences and needs. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Qualitative studies involving adults (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD that reported patients' real feelings, experiences and needs during the self-management process in any setting (hospital, community or home). Studies were excluded if the full text could not be obtained or data were incomplete, if they were duplicate publications or if they were not published in Chinese or English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, extracted data using a standardised form and assessed methodological quality using the 2016 Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Findings (participants' quotations and authors' interpretive statements) were synthesised using a JBI meta-aggregation approach to develop categories and overarching synthesised findings.
results15 qualitative studies were included, comprising 251 patients with COPD. A total of 52 findings were identified, grouped into 13 categories and synthesised into 4 overarching findings: (1) physical symptom burden strongly shapes psychological well-being during COPD self-management; (2) patients face multiple and interrelated barriers to effective self-management; (3) some patients develop active coping strategies and self-management resources; and (4) patients express multidimensional and continuing support needs.
conclusionsPatients with COPD experience substantial physical and psychological distress and face multiple challenges in the self-management process. Healthcare professionals should prioritise patients' lived experiences, establish comprehensive and coordinated support systems and develop diversified, needs-based intervention strategies to address patients' multidimensional needs, thereby enhancing self-management capacity and improving quality of life. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024607051.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.