ArticleBMJ open2026
Young adult perspectives on media content related to suicide in South India: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe important role of responsible media reporting as a low-cost, effective population-level suicide prevention strategy is well documented. However, research into its potential to generate protective effects and how this is perceived by audiences is underexplored in the Indian context. This qualitative study aimed to explore young adults' experiences of exposure to current suicide-related and purpose-designed content in the media.
designThis qualitative study was nested within a larger randomised controlled trial. A semi-structured interview guide was designed to explore participant perspectives and experiences regarding exposure to media content.
settingThe study was conducted with media professionals in Nepal.
participantsA purposive sample of 20 young adults (10 males, 10 females) participated in the study. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and an inductive-deductive approach to thematic analysis was followed.
resultsParticipants shared a range of contrasting experiences related to suicide content in the media and their responses to purpose-designed media content. They reported typical characteristics of current media reporting of suicides involving sensationalism, exaggeration and simplistic assumptions and underscored its impact on mental health. The purpose-designed content elicited a sense of surprise among participants. It stimulated curiosity, improved understanding, challenged misconceptions and instilled hope. In contrast to existing media coverage, they viewed protective content as a valuable means of educating people about recovery and encouraging help-seeking.
conclusionsThis study uncovers unique insights into how young adults in the Indian context perceive and experience suicide reporting in the media. Our audience research indicates that current reporting styles may have harmful effects, while a more hopeful, recovery-oriented approach could offer significant benefits. These insights can be used to support meaningful collaborations between stakeholders in our efforts to encourage safe and respectful reporting that meets audiences' needs to be kept informed.
trial registrationCTRI/2022/09/045439.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.