ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2026
Contributions of anterior and posterior components of cranial flexure on skeletal classification: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between skeletal classification and the anterior and posterior components of cranial base flexure and glenoid fossa position. Materials and Methods: Pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography records of 420 patients were stratified by sex, age, and skeletal classification based on standards for maxillomandibular differential for age-specific patients. Cephalometric measurements (Basion, Nasion, superior aspect of glenoid fossa) were recorded, and their angular deviation, horizontal, and vertical distance from Sella were measured using a 7° constructed plane (H-P) from S-N as a reference. Results were analyzed using regression analysis and analysis of variance, along with intraclass correlation coefficient for reliability. Results: Cranial base flexure was found to be significantly smaller in Class III individuals than Class I or II, due to a larger deflection in posterior cranial base angle from the horizontal plane. The position of Basion relative to Sella was also noted to have a significantly shorter horizontal and significantly longer vertical length in these same individuals. The position of the glenoid fossa showed that Class II patients tended to have a more posterior horizontal displacement from Sella when than those in Class I or III. All measurements, except for cranial base flexure, were significantly larger in males than females. Statistical significance was measured at P < .05. Conclusions: Cranial base angle is significantly smaller in Class III individuals, due to an anteriorly positioned posterior cranial base. The posterior position of the glenoid fossa appears to contribute to the anteroposterior position of the condyle in Class II patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42203217What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.