ReviewChemical reviews2026
Monitoring Membrane Protein Folding Assisted by Insertases and Translocases Using AFM-Based Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy.
Review in Chemical reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review we discuss how atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) approaches can be applied to monitor the unfolding and folding pathways of individual membrane proteins. Particularly, we focus on the insertion and folding of prokaryotic α-helical and β-barrel membrane proteins and compare their unassisted insertion and folding pathways with those assisted by insertases, translocases, and chaperones. We highlight examples in which SMFS is applied to detect the misfolding of membrane proteins such as induced by the lipid composition of the membrane or resulting from unassisted folding. While SMFS can monitor how soluble and transmembrane chaperones reduce misfolding of structural segments, it can also monitor how insertases and translocases guide their stepwise insertion and folding into membranes until the membrane protein has completed folding. Examples show that the inner membrane insertase YidC inserts structural segments in a random order, whereas the SecYEG translocon inserts transmembrane α-helices sequentially. However, when acting together, SecYEG dominates over YidC, consistent with the role of the translocon in directing membrane protein insertion and folding. Finally, we discuss β-barrel membrane protein folding in the bacterial outer membrane, including the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex, and how SMFS applied to native outer membrane vesicles provides access to monitor the insertion and folding of membrane proteins in the native-like membrane environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.