Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42202291›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Using the NASSS-Complexity Assessment Tool to Evaluate the Implementation of "Cadê O Kauê?": Chat-Story Intervention for Youth Participation in Mental Health Promotion in Brazil.

Sakshi Setia, Gabriela Pavarini, Mona Koshkouei, Sheila Giardini Murta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sakshi Setia *Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Rd, Oxford, OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1484-3092
Gabriela Pavarini *Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2ER, United Kingdom, 44 1865 270325.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5574-4021
Mona KoshkoueiNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Rd, Oxford, OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0831-8198
Sheila Giardini MurtaDepartment of Clinical Pyschology, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5515-5219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The global public health challenge of young people's mental health is particularly evident in Brazil, which is considered the most anxious and the fifth most depressed country globally. In response to this, a digital intervention, that takes the form of a storytelling chatbot named "Cadê o Kauê?" (translation: "Where is Kauê?"), was coproduced by an interdisciplinary team of researchers, young people, and narrative designers as part of a project titled Engajadamente. The intervention was designed to strengthen Brazilian adolescents' skills in promoting their peers' mental health through direct support and collective action for mental health. The intervention was rolled out in select schools in Brazil and online via social media, but it encountered challenges during the initial implementation phase in school settings. Objective: This project's primary objective is to evaluate the implementation of "Cadê o Kauê" in school settings in Brazil, assess current and potential complexities, and formulate recommendations to reduce or manage these complexities. The secondary objective of this project is to understand the current and potential sociotechnical change resulting from the implementation of the "Cadê o Kauê" in a real-world setting. Methods: The Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, Sustainability (NASSS) framework was selected as the theoretical framework to identify different areas of complexity across domains and further thinking of ways to reduce or manage these complexities. Data were gathered by conducting semistructured online interviews with the Engajadamente team members based in the United Kingdom and Brazil. The NASSS-Complexity Assessment Tool was used as a sensemaking device to facilitate a collective understanding of the implementation, and narratives were mapped onto specific NASSS domains. Key themes were identified across overarching domains using thematic analysis to meet the objectives of this evaluation. Results: The results mapped onto the NASSS domains generated a narrative about the initial implementation of "Cadê o Kauê?" in schools. Existing and potential complexities across technology, organization, and wider system domains were characterized by interdependencies, unintended consequences, and uncertainties. The implementation of "Cadê o Kauê?" highlighted challenges related to internet dependency, infrastructure limitations, and varying levels of organizational readiness, teacher preparedness, and school culture. Addressing these through offline solutions, additional teacher training, whole-school engagement strategies, and a value-informed complexity approach can enhance accessibility, alignment with school priorities, and adaptability within Brazil's dynamic sociopolitical context. Conclusions: Using the NASSS framework, the evaluation captured both current and emerging complexities in implementing "Cadê o Kauê?" in schools. By engaging with theory-informed approaches to technology implementation projects and deep-diving into discursive dynamic interactions between technology and its "context" of implementation, we have explored ways to manage these complexities and developed suitable recommendations to guide the Engadajamente team and support similar projects in the future.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMental HealthAdolescentBrazilHumansSchoolsdigital mental healthimplementation scienceknowledge translationmental healthyouth participation

Identifiers

PMID42202291
PMCPMC13215631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.