Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42202287›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2026

Developing Customized Personas to Capture Intrinsic Capacity Profiles and Digital Monitoring Intentions in Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.

Zehui Xuan, Yirou Niu, Ruifu Kang, Qian Xiao, Shuai Jin, Jie Zhao, Yanling Wang, Hong Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zehui XuanSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5898-9415
Yirou NiuSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8439-8057
Ruifu KangSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-683X
Qian XiaoSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5657-2863
Shuai JinSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2469-0563
Jie ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6062-899X
Yanling Wang *School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1295-4245
Hong Chang *Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-2726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), focused on monitoring and optimizing the intrinsic capacity (IC) of older adults, is a new model of geriatric care that is currently being accelerated globally. Digital health technologies are recommended for longitudinal IC monitoring to provide precise and timely interventions. However, little is known about the psychological intentions of engaging in digital monitoring of IC according to the profile heterogeneity of IC among older adults.

objectiveThis study aims to map a set of customized personas to capture the profiles of IC and match psychological intentions that support personalized digital IC monitoring.

methodsAn explanatory sequential mixed methods study was conducted at 16 sites in Beijing, China. Older adults aged ≥60 years (n=481) were selected to complete the quantitative survey. Latent profile analysis, descriptive statistics, and logistic regression analyses were performed to cluster subgroups using Mplus (Muthén & Muthén) and SPSS (IBM Corp). A subsample of participants from each profile (n=25) was purposively sampled for semistructured interviews. An inductive-deductive content analysis was used to identify similar attributes and to affirm the personas gradually. A joint statistical and thematic visualization method was used to integrate the customized personas.

resultsThree profiles of IC patterns emerged: "multisubdomain decline-IC imbalance group," "multisubdomain moderate-sensory deficit group," and "multisubdomain robust-whole balance group." The distribution of latent profiles was influenced by age, education, monthly per capita household income, self-rated health, and number of chronic diseases, while positively impacting older adults' functional ability. The following customized personas were captured regarding established themes: "affects my mood-anxious evader," characterized by avoidance and anxiety, low digital interest, and perceived social isolation; "capitalize on what comes-accommodative adopter," pragmatically oriented toward disease detection, with moderate digital openness but limited self-efficacy; and "more autonomy-active improver," who exhibited proactive engagement, high digital literacy, and motivation rooted in self-management and social participation.

conclusionsThis study is the first to integrate latent profile analysis with customized qualitative personas to link the heterogeneity of IC with the psychological intentions underlying digital monitoring. The resulting personas model provides an actionable framework for tailoring digital IC monitoring strategies in community-based integrated care. The findings emphasize the need to align monitoring approaches with older adults' IC characteristics, psychological readiness, digital literacy, and social support to enhance engagement in digital IC monitoring.

Indexed as

IntentionAgedAged, 80 and overChinaDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesdigital monitoringintegrated care for older peopleintrinsic capacitylatent profile analysismixed methods studyolder adultspersonas

Identifiers

PMID42202287
PMCPMC13254505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.