Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42202279›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2026

Inclusion of older adults in UK clinical research-the National Institute for Health and Care Research Year of Birth Project.

Martyn Patel, Divya Tiwari, Shamaila Anwar, Philip Evans, Chloe Meersschaert, Jatinder S Minhas, Jane A H Masoli, Terence J Quinn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martyn PatelNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Older Peoples Medicine, 7 Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9313-3894
Divya TiwariUniversity Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, Bournemouth, Christchurch, UK.
Shamaila AnwarNIHR-RDN Coordinating Centre, Leeds, UK.
Philip EvansUniversity of Exeter, Medical School (Primary Care), Exeter, UK.
Chloe MeersschaertUniversite de Poitiers, Faculte de Sciences, Poitiers, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France.
Jatinder S MinhasUniversity of Leicester, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0576-9105
Jane A H MasoliUniversity of Exeter, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Exeter Medical School, College House, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus Heavitree Road, Exeter EX4 4QJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3794-7065
Terence J QuinnUniversity of Glasgow, Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Walton Building, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1401-0181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInclusion of older adults in research ensures both equity and relevance. We used National Institute of Health and Care Research Year of Birth data to describe inclusion of older adults in contemporary UK clinical research.

methodsWe worked with English research networks to collect individual participant level data on recruits into National Institute of Health and Care Research portfolio studies. We used data from 2022-2023 to 2023-2024 to assess participation. We described data in terms of geography, primary speciality managing the study and study characteristics. In subgroup analyses, we assessed inclusion of the 'oldest old' (aged over 85 years) and inclusion in research from three exemplars: heart failure, Parkinson's disease and palliative care.

resultsIn total, 455 734 participants were included in the analyses. The most common age group included in UK research was 65-74 years (15.5%). People aged over 85 years were 3.2% of all recruits, and this proportion decreased over time. There was modest geographical variation in participant age but marked variation by recruiting speciality. People aged over 85 years accounted for less than 5% of the total participants recruited in 9 of 14 specialities assessed. Older adults were less likely to be recruited into commercial studies. For three conditions of interest, recruitment did not match population epidemiology.

conclusionThis project has demonstrated feasibility of collecting participant age data at scale and provides important metrics for understanding study participation. While there is scope to improve older adult participation across all the study portfolio, there are major equity issues around inclusion in certain speciality areas and commercial research. To complement this abstract, a video abstract is available online.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchPatient SelectionAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleUnited Kingdominclusionolder adultsresearchtrials

Identifiers

PMID42202279
PMCPMC13215583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.