Trial reportJMIR perioperative medicine2026
AI-Generated Avatar Videos for Postoperative Patient Education Among Health Care Workers: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective postoperative communication is vital for patient recovery, yet traditional text-based discharge instructions often lead to poor comprehension and adherence, particularly among patients with limited health literacy. Although educational videos improve understanding and retention, their widespread use has been hampered by high production costs. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) offers a scalable solution for creating engaging video content. Objective: The primary objective of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of creating and deploying AI-generated, avatar-led videos for postoperative instruction delivery. Secondary objectives included comparing knowledge retention, engagement, perceived clarity, and user experience between AI-generated video and traditional text-based handout formats among health care workers. Methods: In this randomized pilot study, 38 health care worker volunteers were recruited as a convenience sample to pilot-test the intervention before patient implementation. Participants were assigned to either a text handout group (n=19, 50%) or an AI-generated video group (n=19, 50%). Both groups received information on 10 common postoperative topics. The primary outcome was objective knowledge, assessed via a 10-item quiz. Secondary outcomes, measured through surveys with 5-point Likert scales, included engagement time, subjective engagement, perceived clarity, usefulness, confidence in understanding, and information retention. Qualitative feedback was also collected. Results: Objective knowledge quiz scores did not differ significantly between groups (mean 8.89, SD 1.20 for the AI-generated video group vs mean 8.21, SD 1.78 for the text handout group; P=.17; Cohen d=0.45). Participants in the AI-generated video group demonstrated significantly higher engagement time (mean 15.11, SD 7.78 minutes vs mean 8.84, SD 4.03 minutes; P=.004; Cohen d=1.04). They also rated instructions as significantly clearer (mean 4.63, SD 0.50 vs mean 4.00, SD 0.82; P=.007; Cohen d=0.93), more engaging (mean 4.05, SD 0.78 vs mean 3.32, SD 1.00; P=.02; Cohen d=0.81), and more effective for retention (mean 4.42, SD 0.84 vs mean 3.37, SD 0.68; P<.001; Cohen d=1.38). Qualitative feedback highlighted the engaging nature of AI-generated videos but noted areas for avatar refinement. Conclusions: In this pilot study with health care workers, AI-generated avatar videos did not improve objective knowledge scores but significantly enhanced engagement, perceived retention and perceived clarity (Cohen d=0.81-1.38). Future studies in actual patient populations with diverse health literacy levels are needed to determine whether these engagement advantages translate into improved knowledge outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.