Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42202173›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2026

Advanced cancer treatment decisions and their patient-facing financial burdens: a thematic analysis.

Rachel C Forcino, Diya Mathur, Amanda N Perry, Garrett T Wasp, Amber E Barnato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel C ForcinoDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, 66160, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9938-4830
Diya MathurGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, United States.
Amanda N PerryThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, 03766, United States.
Garrett T WaspSection of Hematology-Oncology, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, 03766, United States.
Amber E BarnatoThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, 03766, United States.

Funding

Developing and Testing an Interactive Visual Aid for Approaching Decision Making to Stop Cancer Treatment in Advanced CancerK08CA286746 · NCI · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI Garrett T Wasp · 2024 to 2026
$772k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA286746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost research about the high costs of cancer care has focused on characterizing and mitigating the financial hardship patients and families experience after cancer-directed therapy. Few studies have examined how these costs prospectively influence treatment decision-making. Even fewer address how costs impact decisions about symptom-directed therapies. We aim to describe how patient-facing costs of care influence decisions about cancer-directed and symptom-directed therapies for advanced cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed semi-structured interviews with patients, care partners, clinicians, and health system leaders and clinical observations collected by investigators at 3 National Care Institute-designated US cancer centers between July 2019 and May 2021. Two analysts conducted thematic analysis based on the Model of Financial Burden After Cancer Diagnosis.

resultsAnalysis of 157 interviews and 92 observations identified 4 themes: (1) insurance influenced treatment choice and location; (2) medical costs influenced treatment choice, location, and timing; (3) non-medical costs influenced treatment location and timing; and (4) employment changes influenced treatment choice and timing. Patients and care partners emphasized costs of symptom-directed therapies; staff focused on costs of cancer-directed therapies. Patients and care partners described how employment influenced decisions about starting or continuing cancer-directed therapy, while staff noted how employment affected decisions about symptom-directed therapy.

conclusionsPatient-facing costs profoundly influence treatment decisions in advanced cancer care, but differences in perspective among patients, care partners, and clinicians can lead to oversights in treatment decision-making. Eliciting and incorporating patients' varied priorities into treatment decisions can minimize these oversights, better align treatment with goals of care, and reduce financial hardship.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessDecision MakingFinancial StressHealth Care CostsNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedadvanced cancerfinancial burdenqualitative methodstreatment decision-making

Identifiers

PMID42202173
PMCPMC13290472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.