Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42201974›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Flipping plankton.

Bridget S Wade, Paul N Pearson, David J King, Valeria Luciani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bridget S WadeDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7245-8614
Paul N PearsonDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4628-9818
David J KingDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Valeria LucianiDipartimento di Fisica e Scienze della Terra, Università di Ferrara, Ferrara 44122, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0079-9380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden, global reversals in shell coiling direction are a striking and recurrent feature in the fossil record of planktonic foraminifera (marine zooplankton), yet their evolutionary significance has been a mystery. Because coiling direction is a simple, binary character, such shifts have often been interpreted as environmentally induced phenotypic responses rather than indicators of evolutionary change, although it is increasingly evident that genetic variants can have different coiling preferences. Here, we synthesize recent evidence from multiple case studies spanning the Eocene to the Recent (the last 56 Mya). Coiling flips occur on timescales of thousands of years or less, across diverse taxa and ocean basins, far too abruptly to be explained by gradual trait evolution. Instead, these rapid, synchronous coiling reversals may signal cryptic speciation and episodic population sweeps, associated with distinct habitat preferences and water mass distributions. In most cases such replacements would leave little trace in the fossil record, but when competing groups differ in coiling preference, a dramatic and geologically abrupt coiling reversal becomes visible. These findings challenge the assumption that reproductive isolation alone delimits species in planktonic foraminifera and instead supports a model of ecological speciation mediated by habitat partitioning in the open ocean. Shell coiling direction thus serves not as an adaptive trait, but as a fortuitous marker of hidden evolutionary dynamics shaping marine microplankton diversity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionForaminiferaPlanktonZooplanktonAnimalsEcosystemFossilsGenetic Speciationcoilingevolutionpopulation sweepsspeciation

Identifiers

PMID42201974
PMCPMC13229170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.