Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42201949›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Interactions between mosquito genetic background and Wolbachia strain affect dengue virus blocking and fitness in South American populations of Aedes aegypti.

Suk Lan Ser, Nina L Dennington, Heather I Engler, Makael L Harris, Matthew J Jones, Frank W Avila, Eric P Caragata, Ary A Hoffmann, Rafael Maciel de Freitas, Elizabeth A McGraw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Suk Lan SerDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Nina L DenningtonDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Heather I EnglerDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Makael L HarrisDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Matthew J JonesDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Frank W AvilaMax Planck Tandem Group in Mosquito Reproductive Biology, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Eric P CaragataFlorida Medical Entomology Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Nematology, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Vero Beach, Florida, United States of America.
Ary A HoffmannPest and Environmental Research Group, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rafael Maciel de FreitasDepartment of Arbovirology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Elizabeth A McGrawDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7973-088X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mosquito Aedes aegypti is the primary vector of dengue virus, and the release of mosquitoes infected with the bacterium Wolbachia is an increasingly used strategy to reduce dengue transmission. This approach relies on Wolbachia's ability to suppress virus replication within the mosquito, but the effectiveness of virus suppression and the associated fitness costs may depend on interactions among mosquito genetic background, Wolbachia strain, and dengue virus type. Here, we examined these interactions using mosquito populations from Brazil, Paraguay, and Peru infected with two Wolbachia strains, wMelM and wAlbB, and exposed to dengue virus serotype 1 or serotype 2. We measured dengue virus infection in transmission-relevant tissues and quantified mosquito survival, development, and reproduction under controlled laboratory conditions. Wolbachia infection reduced dengue virus infection overall, but the strength of virus suppression varied among mosquito populations, with the strongest blocking observed in Brazilian mosquitoes and the weakest in Peruvian mosquitoes. Across all populations, the wMelM strain consistently produced stronger dengue virus suppression than wAlbB, whereas mosquitoes infected with wAlbB generally exhibited higher fitness, with fitness effects varying among mosquito populations and life-history traits. Together, these results show that genetic interactions among the mosquito, Wolbachia, and dengue virus shape both virus blocking and mosquito fitness, highlighting trade-offs that may influence the establishment and long-term effectiveness of Wolbachia-based dengue control programs.

Indexed as

AedesDengue VirusMosquito VectorsWolbachiaAnimalsBrazilDengueFemaleGenetic FitnessPeruSouth AmericaVirus Replication

Identifiers

PMID42201949
PMCPMC13245867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.