ArticlePloS one2026
A clustering-based trajectory analytics of functional loss and recovery among older adults.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesFunctional loss and recovery in older adults are heterogeneous, with important implications for independence, care needs, and survival. While Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are routinely assessed, most existing approaches reduce them to summary scores, thereby losing information about the order, timing, duration, and recurrence of functional change. We introduce a novel trajectory analytics framework designed to identify clinically interpretable trajectory phenotypes and evaluate their association with mortality. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analyzed 1.3 million ADL assessments from 265,530 residents in U.S. Veterans Affairs nursing homes. A hybrid trajectory clustering framework was developed, combining spell-based sequence construction, optimal-matching-based dissimilarity, and scalable quality-guided clustering. Sequence comparison was designed to preserve temporal structure while remaining computationally feasible for large-scale longitudinal data. Candidate clustering solutions were evaluated using multiple quality metrics, and mortality differences across clusters were examined using Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age and sex.
resultsThirteen distinct ADL trajectory clusters were identified from about 110,000 unique trajectories, differing in dominant disability states, duration, recurrence, and mortality risk. Short, severe trajectories showed the highest early mortality, whereas longer, milder trajectories involving limited impairments, such as walking or bathing, were more stable and had lower mortality. The highest-risk cluster showed approximately 48% cumulative mortality within the first year and remained associated with the greatest hazard of death after adjustment. Sex-based sensitivity analyses showed broadly similar mortality ordering across males and females, although female-specific estimates were less precise because of the smaller sample size. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThe proposed framework reveals substantial heterogeneity in functional trajectories and their prognostic implications, providing an interpretable and computationally efficient tool for large-scale ADL trajectory clustering. These findings support trajectory-based phenotyping as a useful approach for personalized care planning, targeted resource allocation, and policymaking in long-term care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.