ArticlePloS one2026
Limited and idiosyncratic thermal acclimation in soil saprotrophic fungi.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increased soil microbial activity due to higher temperatures caused by heatwaves could lead to higher carbon losses from soil into the atmosphere, further accelerating climate change. Hence, knowing how soil microbes respond to higher temperatures is crucial for improving soil-atmosphere carbon circulation models in the context of climate change. Thermal acclimation may reduce carbon losses from soils by retarding increases in microbial activity in response to elevated temperatures. However, the capacity of soil microbes to acclimate to realistic soil temperatures in vitro, and our ability to predict this acclimation based on traits, remains poorly understood. We tested how submission to two previous temperature treatments or 'environmental histories' affected subsequent growth at two exposure temperatures for seven widespread soil saprotrophic fungi. We hypothesized that (1) soil fungi have higher intrinsic growth and weaker self-limitation after exposure to a colder environmental history, and (2) the response of fungal eco-physiological traits (pigmentation and spore load) to elevated temperature exposure predicts fungal acclimation in terms of growth. Our results showed that environmental history had limited impact on the tested fungi, and trait responses to history temperatures did not predict fungal growth after treatment with both history and exposure temperatures. We conclude that fungal thermal acclimation is limited and idiosyncratic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.