ArticlePloS one2026
Progress in the molecular phylogeny of Cotesia acuminata and C. melitaearum cryptic species complexes.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryptic species present major challenges for biodiversity and evolutionary research due to the morphological similarity and frequent lack of available genetic and ecological data. In parasitoid wasps, this is especially true for lineages with limited taxonomic and genetic sampling and unclear geographic ranges. Here we reconstruct the phylogeny of Cotesia wasps parasitizing Melitaeini butterflies, including two cryptic species complexes (Cotesia acuminata agg. and C. melitaearum agg.). Using a ten-gene dataset from samples collected in Europe, Asia, and North America, we inferred relationships among 22 Cotesia species using maximum likelihood. We also included non-Melitaeini associated Cotesia to assess whether the parasitoids of Melitaeini form a monophyletic group. Our analyses yielded a highly supported phylogeny, revealing four major clades, three of which included the Melitaeini associated species. This confirms that the Cotesia parasitizing Melitaeini butterflies are polyphyletic, likely resulting from independent host shifts across the genus. Each clade is further subdivided into subclades corresponding to the different cryptic species complexes, clarifying previously unresolved relationships. These results provide a robust framework for future studies on the evolution, ecology, and host use dynamics of Cotesia wasps and highlight the utility of multi-locus data for resolving phylogenies in morphologically cryptic taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.