ArticlePloS one2026
Coral restoration alters reef soundscapes but machine learning and manual analyses suggest different recovery rates.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coral restoration is recognised as a critical tool to mitigate pantropical degradation of reef ecosystems. Robust monitoring of restoration progress is crucial for projects to evaluate their success, improve practice, and share knowledge. However, traditional visual surveys often fail to capture the full impact of coral restoration on reef function. Therefore, we employed Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) to assess whether the soundscape of a coral restoration site in the Seychelles differs from adjacent healthy and degraded reference reefs. We applied two methods of soundscape analysis: manual detection of unidentified fish sounds; and machine learning-based Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection analysis. Results were approach-specific: the manual approach highlighted similarities in fish calls between the restoration site and the healthy reference reef, while the machine learning approach extracted broader soundscape patterns, clustering the restoration site alongside the degraded reference reef. Although this is a single-site study, these findings suggest that a) coral restoration alters reef soundscapes, though recovery time may be taxon-specific, and b) multiple metrics are needed to bridge single-taxon and broad soundscape scales. This study contributes to the evolving field of soundscape ecology in coral reef ecosystems, highlighting the utility of PAM in monitoring changes to reef function through coral restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.