Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42201863›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Histological and metagenomic analysis of microbial communities in archaeological human bones.

Damla Kaptan, Anne Cecilie Flemming Elvers, Anna Kjær Knudsen, Hannes Schroeder, Hege Ingjerd Hollund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Damla KaptanMuseum of Archaeology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7953-1354
Anne Cecilie Flemming ElversFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna Kjær KnudsenFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8743-554X
Hannes SchroederFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hege Ingjerd HollundMuseum of Archaeology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-669X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buried archaeological bones tend to be heavily degraded by microorganisms. This type of biodegradation was already identified in the 19th century and remains a subject of continuous investigation. However, the underlying processes are still not fully understood, and the organisms responsible for the decay have not been clearly identified. Technological advances in genetic sequencing now allow detailed study of the bone microbiome. And yet, identifying the species causing the observed bioerosion has proven challenging. Relatively few studies have combined the investigation of bone degradation by microscopy, so-called histotaphonomy, with metagenomic analyses. This study aims to bridge this gap. We utilize a large set of human bone samples from medieval cemeteries in south-western Norway. Detailed microscopic analyses have been carried out, showing diverse levels of preservation. The extent of bioerosion is correlated with the results from metagenomic analyses as well as environmental factors. Microbiome diversity is greater and more evenly distributed in well-preserved bones with limited bioerosion, particularly those recovered from burials beneath church floors, contrasting with outdoor cemeteries. Fungal taxa were detected in only a single sample in the metagenomic data despite histological evidence of fungal structures, and their role in bone bioerosion remains unclear. Our findings show that preservation state is strongly associated with microbiome composition. The most prevalent genus found was Streptomyces, supporting previous research suggesting that bacteria within this group could be involved in bone bioerosion.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyBone and BonesMetagenomicsMicrobiotaBacteriaFungiHumansNorwayPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID42201863
PMCPMC13215491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.