ArticlePloS one2026
Histological and metagenomic analysis of microbial communities in archaeological human bones.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Buried archaeological bones tend to be heavily degraded by microorganisms. This type of biodegradation was already identified in the 19th century and remains a subject of continuous investigation. However, the underlying processes are still not fully understood, and the organisms responsible for the decay have not been clearly identified. Technological advances in genetic sequencing now allow detailed study of the bone microbiome. And yet, identifying the species causing the observed bioerosion has proven challenging. Relatively few studies have combined the investigation of bone degradation by microscopy, so-called histotaphonomy, with metagenomic analyses. This study aims to bridge this gap. We utilize a large set of human bone samples from medieval cemeteries in south-western Norway. Detailed microscopic analyses have been carried out, showing diverse levels of preservation. The extent of bioerosion is correlated with the results from metagenomic analyses as well as environmental factors. Microbiome diversity is greater and more evenly distributed in well-preserved bones with limited bioerosion, particularly those recovered from burials beneath church floors, contrasting with outdoor cemeteries. Fungal taxa were detected in only a single sample in the metagenomic data despite histological evidence of fungal structures, and their role in bone bioerosion remains unclear. Our findings show that preservation state is strongly associated with microbiome composition. The most prevalent genus found was Streptomyces, supporting previous research suggesting that bacteria within this group could be involved in bone bioerosion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.