ArticlePloS one2026
Estimating historic seabed carbon disturbance by port dredging and aggregate extraction in NW Europe.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extent to which different human activities disturb seabed carbon, the largest long-term organic carbon reservoir on the planet, is poorly understood. Research to date has focused primarily on bottom trawl fisheries, but industries that target and extract marine sediments are likely to disturb significant masses of sedimentary organic carbon. This can lead to its remineralisation and reduce the capacity of the ocean to absorb atmospheric CO2. In this study, we combine archival documents, industry records, and published seabed substrate data, to estimate historical disturbance of sedimentary organic carbon on the Northwest European Shelf (NWES) from port dredging activities and marine aggregate extraction. Monte Carlo simulations were used to provide probabilistic estimates of annual carbon disturbance and associated upper and lower bounds (5th and 95th percentiles, respectively). Based on annual Monte Carlo simulations run between 1995-2021, our results suggest that port dredging over the shelf area disturbed 2.2 ± 0.9 Mt organic carbon year-1. In the case of marine aggregate extraction, simulations run between 1955-2022, suggest that marine aggregate extraction disturbed 0.4 ± 0.3 Mt organic carbon year-1. At a country scale, analysis of activities in UK waters suggest that organic carbon disturbance from port dredging and aggregate extraction activities are approximately three orders of magnitude lower than published estimates of disturbance by bottom trawling. Nevertheless, historical and contemporary port dredging and aggregate extraction present substantial and spatially concentrated sources of anthropogenic carbon disturbance that have not been systematically quantified across the Northwest European Shelf until now. These findings therefore address an important knowledge gap and have the potential to inform marine management and conservation strategies aimed at minimising organic carbon loss from the seabed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.