ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026
Successful Multidisciplinary Management of Esophageal Perforation Complicated by Septic Shock: A Race Against Time.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophageal perforation is a life-threating condition caused by full-thickness disruption of the esophageal wall, leading to mediastinal and pleural contamination, with high mortality, especially when diagnosis or source control is delayed. CASE REPORT A 43-year-old man with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus, active smoking and alcohol use, paranoid schizophrenia, and severe acute esophagitis underwent diagnostic upper endoscopy for dysphagia. One week later, he presented with 4 days of left-sided chest pain, epigastric pain, and repeated vomiting. Shortly after admission he deteriorated, with hypoxemia and shock. Chest radiography showed bilateral tension pneumothoraces, pleural effusions, and pneumomediastinum. Bilateral tube thoracostomies were performed, and he required intubation, mechanical ventilation, and norepinephrine. Pleural fluid was turbid with markedly elevated amylase, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) confirmed esophageal perforation with mediastinal contamination. Because the mucosa was severely ulcerated and friable, immediate stenting was deferred. He was managed with broad-spectrum antimicrobials, drainage, video-assisted thoracoscopic irrigation, nil per os, total parenteral nutrition, and close radiologic follow-up. Persistent leakage prompted decortication and transfer for esophageal stenting. Follow-up imaging showed sealing of the leak, and he recovered completely. CONCLUSIONS Early recognition and timely intervention are essential. In selected high-risk patients, a staged multidisciplinary approach can lead to favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.