Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42201735›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Video-Based Peer Support and Exclusive Breastfeeding and Maternal Self-Efficacy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kris Yuet Wan Lok, Caroline Hoi Lam Ip, Ying Dai, Yuen Fan Chan, Martha Sin Lam Choi, Christine Lam, Sze Ki Wong, Lai Fong Ho, Pui Hing Chau, Yan-Shing Chang and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04621266 (Effectiveness of a Home-based Peer Support Program for Chinese Mothers With Low Breastfeeding Self-efficacy to Increase the Exclusivity and Duration of Breastfeeding), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04621266 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of a Home-based Peer Support Program for Chinese Mothers With Low Breastfeeding Self-efficacy to Increase the Exclusivity and Duration of Breastfeeding: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2024Enrolled442ConditionsBreastfeedingArmsOnline Home-based peer support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kris Yuet Wan LokSchool of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Caroline Hoi Lam IpSchool of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Ying DaiSchool of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Yuen Fan ChanSchool of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Martha Sin Lam ChoiSchool of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Christine LamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong.
Sze Ki WongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong.
Lai Fong HoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Pui Hing ChauSchool of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Yan-Shing ChangFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Debra BickWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Peer support is a promising strategy to improve breastfeeding outcomes, but evidence for online formats is limited. Objective: To evaluate whether structured peer support delivered via video calls improves exclusive breastfeeding rates and maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, randomized clinical trial enrolled first-time mothers with low breastfeeding confidence from 4 public postnatal wards in Hong Kong from January 31, 2021, to June 30, 2024. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to intervention or control. The primary analysis was conducted from July 1 to 31, 2024, with final data analysis completed by December 31, 2025. Intervention: The intervention included usual postnatal care, consisting of access to lactation consultants and standard breastfeeding information from the Department of Health, plus at least 2 video call sessions with trained peer support volunteers at 10 days and 1 month post partum. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of infants who were exclusively breastfed at 6 months post partum. Secondary outcomes included exclusive breastfeeding at 1, 2, and 4 months post partum and maternal self-efficacy (measured using the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form) at 2 and 4 months. All outcomes were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Among 442 participants, 224 were allocated to the intervention group and 218 were allocated to the control group. The mean (SD) maternal age was 32.4 (4.0) years (32.4 [4.2] years in the intervention group and 32.3 [3.9] years in the control group). The primary 6-month outcome did not differ significantly between groups (37 of 184 [20.1%] vs 29 of 186 [15.6%]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.57 [95% CI, 0.85-2.89]; P = .15); however, exclusive breastfeeding at 2 months (a secondary outcome) was significantly higher in the intervention group (54 of 199 [27.1%] vs 38 of 200 [19.0%]; AOR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.08-3.01]; P = .02). Longitudinal analysis confirmed higher odds of exclusive breastfeeding in the intervention group over time, with the largest difference at 2 months. Breastfeeding self-efficacy showed significantly greater improvement in the intervention group (time × intervention interaction: β = 1.01 [95% CI, 0.21-1.81]; P = .01), with a higher score at 4 months (adjusted β, 4.65 [95% CI, 1.60-7.70]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, video call-based peer support did not increase exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months; however, it significantly increased exclusive breastfeeding at 2 months and improved maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy, offering a scalable model for postnatal care integration. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04621266.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMothersPeer GroupSelf EfficacySocial SupportAdultFemaleHong KongHumansInfantInfant, NewbornVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID42201735
PMCPMC13216982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.