ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robotic thoracic surgery training in the UK and Republic of Ireland: national survey of trainee exposure, preparedness, and barriers.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is increasingly being incorporated into contemporary practice across the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (ROI). However, national data on trainee exposure and preparedness is lacking. This study is the first to evaluate cardiothoracic trainees' experiences and perceptions of training for RATS nationally. A multicentre, cross-sectional survey study was conducted between June and October 2025 of cardiothoracic trainees (ST1-ST8), post-certificate fellows, and equivalent trust appointed doctors. A 30-item, web-based questionnaire assessed institutional exposure, simulation access, operative console experience, and perceived barriers to RATS training. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics; while free-text responses underwent inductive thematic analysis. Eighty-two responses were received from all 14 training deaneries. RATS was performed in 71% (58/82) of respondents' units; however only 16% (9/58) reported a structured training programme in place. Dual console systems were absent or unused in 43% (25/58) of robotic units. Over half (54%, 32/59) of respondents had not fully performed a single RATS procedure. Most respondents (83%, 68/82) agreed that more robotic training is required before the completion of training. Key barriers to training included lack of dual-console utilisation, operative exposure limited to bedside assisting only, and restricted simulation access. Despite widespread adoption of RATS, opportunities for structured training remain inconsistent across the UK and ROI. National standards should be developed to incorporate structured robotic training within the cardiothoracic curriculum, including access to simulation, routine dual-console use, and competency-based progression from bedside assistant to primary operator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.