Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42201587›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Efficiency of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery in resection of nodules previously localised with embolisation microcoils.

Elena Kakouri, Diana Baltag, Cristina Viola, Bartlomej Szafron, Jakub Kadlec, Waldemar Bartosik, Michael Crawford, Vasileios Kouritas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elena KakouriDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK.
Diana BaltagDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK.
Cristina ViolaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK.
Bartlomej SzafronDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK.
Jakub KadlecDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK.
Waldemar BartosikDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK.
Michael CrawfordDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK.
Vasileios KouritasDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK. Vasileios.kouritas@nnuh.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced imaging and lung cancer screening programmes have led to increased detection of small pulmonary nodules, highlighting the need for localisation techniques. CT-guided microcoil localisation facilitates intraoperative identification of such nodules. Its use in conjunction with robot assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) remains under investigation. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficiency of RATS for resection of lung nodules following microcoil localisation. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CT-guided microcoil localisation followed by RATS resection (January 2018 - May 2025) was performed. Demographic, procedural, and outcome data was collected, including localisation success, type of ultimate resection (including conversion to lobectomy), margin status, complications and others. Multivariable analysis identified independent risk factors for conversion to unplanned lobectomy. Sixty-four patients were included in the analysis, with a lesion mean size 12.5 ± 5.6 mm. Sublobar resection (wedge or anatomical) was achieved in 90.6% (n = 58) of patients. All patients achieved R0 resection. Unplanned completion lobectomy was necessary in 9.4% (n = 6) of cases and was associated with microcoil position within the lung parenchyma or fissure, compared to the visceral pleura (30.8% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.001), as well as shorter resection margins (after the initial wedge resection) (9.7 ± 7.2 vs. 15.2 ± 6.7 mm, p = 0.04). Microcoil dislodgement occurred in one patient. The most common complication was small pneumothorax (37.5%), with only one patient requiring chest drain insertion. CT-guided microcoil localisation is safe and effective for intra-operative localisation of lung nodules and allows for smaller resections and avoidance of completion lobectomy with low morbidity.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticLung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresThoracic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeLocalisationLungMicrocoilsNoduleRATS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.