ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Efficiency of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery in resection of nodules previously localised with embolisation microcoils.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced imaging and lung cancer screening programmes have led to increased detection of small pulmonary nodules, highlighting the need for localisation techniques. CT-guided microcoil localisation facilitates intraoperative identification of such nodules. Its use in conjunction with robot assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) remains under investigation. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficiency of RATS for resection of lung nodules following microcoil localisation. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CT-guided microcoil localisation followed by RATS resection (January 2018 - May 2025) was performed. Demographic, procedural, and outcome data was collected, including localisation success, type of ultimate resection (including conversion to lobectomy), margin status, complications and others. Multivariable analysis identified independent risk factors for conversion to unplanned lobectomy. Sixty-four patients were included in the analysis, with a lesion mean size 12.5 ± 5.6 mm. Sublobar resection (wedge or anatomical) was achieved in 90.6% (n = 58) of patients. All patients achieved R0 resection. Unplanned completion lobectomy was necessary in 9.4% (n = 6) of cases and was associated with microcoil position within the lung parenchyma or fissure, compared to the visceral pleura (30.8% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.001), as well as shorter resection margins (after the initial wedge resection) (9.7 ± 7.2 vs. 15.2 ± 6.7 mm, p = 0.04). Microcoil dislodgement occurred in one patient. The most common complication was small pneumothorax (37.5%), with only one patient requiring chest drain insertion. CT-guided microcoil localisation is safe and effective for intra-operative localisation of lung nodules and allows for smaller resections and avoidance of completion lobectomy with low morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42201587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.