Observational studyHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Do patients scheduled for inguinal hernia repair express a preference for the repair technique? What questions do they frequently ask?
Observational study in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to evaluate whether patients scheduled for elective inguinal hernia repair express a preference for the surgical technique prior to surgery, and to investigate the relationship of this preference with perceived quality of information, the decision-making process, preoperative anxiety level, and information needs.
methodsIn this cross-sectional, observational, multicenter study, a total of 140 adult patients were included from three centers (one public and two private hospitals) (public: n = 70; private: n = 70). Data were collected using a preoperative patient questionnaire. The decision-making process was assessed using the Sure of Myself, Understand Information, Risk-Benefit Ratio, and Encouragement (SURE) scale, while anxiety and information needs were measured using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Perceived quality of information and factors influencing surgical technique preference were evaluated using Likert scales. A surgical technique preference score and a perceived information score were calculated as composite indices. The primary outcome was whether the patient reported a preference regarding the surgical technique prior to surgery.
resultsOf the 140 patients, 86 (61.4%) reported a preference for the surgical technique; this rate was 72.9% (51/70) in private hospitals and 50.0% (35/70) in public hospitals (p = 0.040). Preference scores and perceived information scores were significantly higher in private hospitals (p < 0.001). Shared decision-making was more common in private hospitals, whereas surgeon-directed decision-making predominated in public hospitals (p = 0.012). The most influential factors affecting preference were expectations of postoperative pain and the risk of recurrence. When preoperative concerns were analyzed, patients in private hospitals more frequently inquired about postoperative comfort and functional recovery, whereas patients in public hospitals more often questioned whether the mesh (prosthetic material) could be harmful to the body.
conclusionA substantial proportion of patients scheduled for elective inguinal hernia repair actively participate in the preoperative decision-making process and express a preference for the surgical technique. This preference is particularly associated with concerns about recurrence risk and postoperative pain, and patients' preoperative information needs differ according to the type of healthcare institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42201563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.