Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42201487›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2026

Safety and Tolerability of Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: Results From a 1-Year, Phase III, Open-Label Study.

Joel C Joyce, H Chih-Ho Hong, Dareen D Siri, Darryl Toth, Howard Kallender, YuTzu Kuo, Diana Stefani-Hunyady, Kim A Papp

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05456529 (A Phase 3, Open-Label, One-Year Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05456529 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Open-Label, One-Year Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents (Ages ≥ 12 Years to < 18 Years) With Atopic Dermatitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncyte CorporationRan2022 to 2024Enrolled103ConditionsAtopic Dermatitis (AD)ArmsRuxolitinib Cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joel C JoyceDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Endeavor Health, 9933 Woods Drive, Suite 100, Skokie, IL, 60077, USA. joel.joyce@endeavorhealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7300-8516
H Chih-Ho HongDepartment of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9963-8319
Dareen D SiriSneeze, Wheeze, and Itch Clinical Research Center, Normal, IL, USA.
Darryl TothProbity Medical Research, Windsor, ON, Canada.
Howard KallenderIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5634-883X
YuTzu KuoIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Diana Stefani-HunyadyIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5021-9412
Kim A PappProbity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRuxolitinib cream (1.5%) has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients aged ≥ 2 years with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.

objectiveWe aimed to further investigate the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib cream in adolescents with atopic dermatitis in an open-label study.

methodsPatients aged 12-17 years with atopic dermatitis, an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 2/3, and 3-20% affected body surface area applied twice-daily 1.5% ruxolitinib cream for an 8-week continuous treatment period, followed by a 44-week long-term safety period in which ruxolitinib cream was applied twice daily as needed. Safety was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included plasma trough concentrations of ruxolitinib. Affected body surface area, ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index, achievement of Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0/1, and ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in the itch Numerical Rating Scale were exploratory endpoints.

resultsOf 103 patients, 59.2% had a baseline Investigator's Global Assessment of 3. Mean baseline body surface area and Eczema Area and Severity Index scores were 8.9% and 6.4, respectively. Over 52 weeks, 42 patients (40.8%) had treatment-emergent adverse events, most commonly upper respiratory tract infection (10.7%) and nasopharyngitis (8.7%). Three patients (2.9%) had grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events; all were considered unrelated to treatment by the investigator. Steady-state ruxolitinib plasma concentrations during the continuous treatment period were low (geometric mean [geometric coefficient of variation], 14.2 [169] nM), consistent with the lack of observed treatment-emergent adverse events associated with systemic Janus kinase inhibition. Clinical improvements occurred during the continuous treatment period and were maintained or improved with as-needed treatment through the long-term safety period to week 52 (mean affected body surface area, 1.3%; ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index, 87.0%; Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1, 82.6%; ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in itch Numerical Rating Scale, 41.7%).

conclusionsRuxolitinib cream (1.5%) was well tolerated and efficacious with long-term as-needed use in adolescents with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis, consistent with safety and efficacy findings reported in previous phase III studies in adolescents and adults. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT05456529 (registered 13 July, 2022).

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicPyrazolesAdministration, CutaneousAdolescentChildDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleNasopharyngitisNitrilesPruritusPyrimidinesRespiratory Tract InfectionsSeverity of Illness IndexSkin CreamNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID42201487
PMCPMC13473383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.