ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2026
The analysis of cancer screening trials in which the outcome is the incidence of late-stage disease.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Health Service-Galleri randomized trial seeks to determine the extent to which a blood-based multi-cancer screening test can lead to a reduced incidence of a variety of cancers that are at a late stage as of the time of initial diagnosis. In February 2026, the investigators of this trial issued a news release indicating that after several years of follow-up, for a group of 12 pre-specified forms of cancer there was a lower incidence of stage IV cancer among patients in the intervention arm of the trial than in the control arm. The release stated that a group of participants whose stage IV cancer could not have been influenced by the screening - those with stage IV disease already present as of the initial screening exam - had been excluded from this analysis. We argue that while it is appropriate to restrict such an analysis to persons without prevalent stage IV cancer at the start of the trial, a valid result will be obtained only after accounting for the counterparts of these cases that are present in the trial's control arm. We describe how this can be accomplished, and the assumptions needed for such a strategy to succeed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42201458What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.