ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2026
Daily-Life Peer Interactions Among Adolescents at Familial High-Risk for Psychosis: An Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Study.
Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychosis risk is associated with impaired social functioning among young people. However, with whom and in what ways social relationships suffer among high-risk youth is not clearly understood. This study evaluated differences in the odds of engaging in peer interactions, as well as emotional experience during peer interactions, between adolescents at familial high-risk for psychosis (FHR) and low-risk peers. Participants included 19 FHR youth and 24 low-risk controls (ages 13-19). Frequency of peer interactions, as well as negative and positive emotional experience during peer interactions were assessed in daily-life using ecological momentary assessment (EMA; n = 3190 observations). Multilevel models demonstrated that relative to controls, FHR youth reported lower positive emotion during everyday peer interactions. No group differences were observed in odds of peer interactions or negative emotion during peer interactions. Findings indicate that associations positive emotion during peer interactions may be altered in FHR adolescents, with implications for transdiagnostic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42201455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.