Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42201426›Full record

ReviewCancer causes & control : CCC2026

Diet, ultra-processed foods, and gut dysbiosis: linking emulsifiers to colorectal cancer risk.

Nishit Parekh, Kajal Patil, Pooja Patel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nishit ParekhSSR College of Pharmacy, Silvassa, Silvassa, India. nishitparekh54@gmail.com.
Kajal PatilSSR College of Pharmacy, Silvassa, Silvassa, India.
Pooja PatelSSR College of Pharmacy, Silvassa, Silvassa, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising intake of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has raised concerns about their effects on gut microbiota and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Emulsifiers, among the various additives in ultra-processed foods, have attracted considerable interest due to their possible involvement in gut dysbiosis, inflammation, and carcinogenesis. Emulsifiers, including polysorbates and carboxymethylcellulose, have the potential to compromise the intestinal barrier, modify microbial composition, and foster a pro-inflammatory environment that may facilitate the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). This review examines the mechanistic pathways connecting dietary emulsifiers to changes in gut microbiota, emphasising their impact on microbial diversity, mucosal integrity, and immune responses. The discussion includes epidemiological evidence linking UPF consumption to CRC incidence. Examining the relationship among diet, emulsifiers, and gut microbiota can guide dietary recommendations and regulatory policies to reduce CRC risk. Future research must prioritize the identification of safe food additives and the development of targeted interventions aimed at restoring gut homeostasis.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDietDysbiosisEmulsifying AgentsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansRisk FactorsEmulsifying AgentsColorectal cancerEmulsifiersGut dysbiosisInflammationMicrobiotaUltra-processed foods

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.