ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Rectal neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum: update on endoscopic and surgical treatment].
Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNET) are rare but increasingly more common entities, which are usually an incidental finding during routine colonoscopy. The rNETs are usually well-differentiated with low metastatic potential. Thus, staging is only required in high-risk situations (size ≥ 10 mm, invasion of the muscularis propria, grading > G1, L1, V1). Endoscopic resection is the most frequently used treatment. Based on the depth of invasion, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) are applied. In cases of R1 resection, re-endoscopic resection can be conducted to achieve R0 status. Radical surgical resection with higher or lower anterior rectum (HAR/LAR) resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) is indicated for rNETs > 20 mm, rNETs between 10-20 mm with risk factors (R1 resection after second endoscopic resection, Ki67 > 10%, L1, V1), lymph node metastasis and also in cases of distant metastasis if those are also resectable. In cases of unresectable distant metastasis, systemic treatment is applied. The prognosis after treatment of well-differentiated rNETs is generally favorable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42201400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.