Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42201380›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026

PROQURE-I: a phase I study adding concurrent [

Lotte G Zuur, Denise S Hoogenkamp, Esmée C A van der Sar, Debra van Asten, Marnix G E H Lam, Jochem R N van der Voort-van Zyp, Pim J van Leeuwen, Berlinda J de Wit-van der Veen, Daphne M V de Vries-Huizing, Jeroen J M A Hendrikx and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lotte G Zuur *Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-7392-1626
Denise S Hoogenkamp *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-7780-4545
Esmée C A van der SarDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4406-2409
Debra van AstenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-3433-0819
Marnix G E H LamDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jochem R N van der Voort-van ZypDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Pim J van LeeuwenDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Berlinda J de Wit-van der VeenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7860-2904
Daphne M V de Vries-HuizingDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1967-8148
Jeroen J M A HendrikxDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Arthur J A T BraatDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8824-8697
Wouter V VogelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. w.vogel@nki.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4992-8024

Funding

Novartis Pharma B.V. Novartis Pharma B.V.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent treatment of N1M0 prostate cancer (PCa) with locoregional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has suboptimal five-year recurrence-free rates. Adding [

methodsIn the multi-centre phase-1 dose-escalation study (PROQURE-I), treatment-naïve cT1-4N1M0 PCa patients received standard locoregional EBRT (25-35 fractions) and 2-3 years ADT with concurrent [

resultsFourteen patients were included. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed and the MTD was not reached. Reported grade 1-2 toxicities were related to EBRT. Median absorbed dose to the primary tumour of 0.71 Gy/GBq (interquartile range (IQR) 0.5-2.9) at the 9 GBq; 0.91 Gy/GBq (IQR 0.6-1.0) at 7.4 GBq cycle 1; and 0.47 Gy/GBq (0.3-0.5) at cycle 2.

conclusionsConcurrent [

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsDipeptidesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingLutetiumProstatic NeoplasmsRadioisotopesAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenAndrogen AntagonistsDipeptidesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingLutetiumLutetium-177lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetanProstate-Specific AntigenPSMA-617RadioisotopesCurativeLutetium-177-PSMANode-positivePhase 1Prostate cancer radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42201380
PMCPMC13421286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.