ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Eeg-based analysis of cognitive load under 2D/3D visual stimuli.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing prevalence of 3D videos, investigating the differences in cognitive impact between 2D and 3D videos has become an important issue. In this paper, we utilized electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate differences in cognitive load when subjects viewed 2D and 3D videos, which were classified into four types according to the contents. Additionally, we employed the cognitive load index (CLI) and event-related synchronization/desynchronization (ERS/ERD) to evaluate the variations of EEG patterns. Subjects were exposed to both 2D and 3D video stimuli, and the corresponding EEG data were recorded. Then, we analyzed the responses of various oscillations under different stimuli, and CLI and ERS/ERD were utilized to evaluate the brain activity of different subjects. According to our experiments and analysis, videos that involve simple observational tasks consistently induced a higher cognitive load in subjects when they were viewing 3D videos. However, for videos that involve calculation tasks, the differences in cognitive load induced by 2D and 3D videos were not obvious. Thus, we concluded that 3D videos could generally induce a higher cognitive load; however, the extent of the differences also depended on the content of the video stimuli and the viewing purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42201364What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.