ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Hereditary breast cancer : Syndromes, pathology, clinical aspects].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 5-10% of all breast cancers arise from a hereditary predisposition. In addition to the high-risk genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, other genes involved in homologous recombination repair (including PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, RAD51C/D, BARD1) and genes associated with classic tumor predisposition syndromes (TP53, PTEN, STK11, CDH1, NF1) are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. In addition, polygenic risk contributes to the individual probability of developing the disease through the additive effect of numerous low-penetrance variants.Pathology can contribute significantly to the identification of patients with possible hereditary tumorigenesis. Certain morphological and immunohistochemical features may indicate a genetic background-for example, a lymphocyte-rich, triple-negative phenotype, G3, with medullary features may indicate a BRCA1 mutation, or an invasive lobular carcinoma may indicate a CDH1 mutation. Clinical constellations such as early age of onset, bilateral tumors, associated tumors, or familial clustering are also important indicators.The identification of a germline mutation has far-reaching consequences for the affected individual and the entire family. Intensive follow-up care programs are offered to those affected; risk-reducing surgery may be considered for mutations in certain risk genes. There are also therapeutic implications, such as the use of PARP inhibitors in BRCA1/2-associated HER2-negative breast cancer. Predictive genetic testing may be considered for relatives as well as intensified early detection programs and risk-reducing surgery, if necessary.Close interdisciplinary cooperation is therefore crucial in order to identify patients with possible hereditary tumorigenesis at an early stage and to enable an individualized therapy and follow-up care strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42201356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.