ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Comparison of Four Screening Markers [(C16 + C18:1)/C2, C14/C3, C12/C0, and C12/C2] for Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase II Deficiency in the Nationwide Newborn Screening Program in Japan.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
False-positive results are known to occur frequently in newborn screening (NBS) for carnitine palmitoyltransferase II (CPT II) deficiency, highlighting the need to identify appropriate screening markers. The present study aimed to compare the performance of two markers currently used in NBS for CPT II deficiency, (C16 + C18:1)/C2 and C14/C3, with two promising alternative markers, C12/C0 and C12/C2. We analyzed non-patient data from the 2023 fiscal year NBS program together with patient data for CPT II deficiency and very-long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency derived from previously reported case series. Marker performance was assessed using precision-recall curves, including an analysis in which patients with the myopathic form of CPT II deficiency who passed NBS using (C16 + C18:1)/C2 and C14/C3 were reclassified as true positives. The area under the precision-recall curve values for C12/C2 and C14/C3 were 0.711 (95% confidence interval, 0.492-0.923) and 0.569 (0.341-0.779), respectively, indicating superior performance compared with the other markers. When cases with the myopathic form of CPT II deficiency were included as true positives, the performance of all markers decreased markedly. Although some patients with the myopathic form are still likely to be missed, C12/C2 appears to be an effective marker for reducing false-positive results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.