ReviewInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Newborn Screening in Saudi Arabia: Brief History, Current Practice, and Future Direction.
Review in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Saudi Arabia National Newborn Screening (NBS) program is a pillar of public health, offering timely detection of treatable, life-threatening, or disabling conditions in neonates. This comprehensive review critically examines the current laboratory diagnostic practices employed for metabolite analysis within this program. It focuses primarily on biochemical NBS conducted via dried blood spot testing and evaluates the methodologies, technical challenges, and stringent quality assurance measures that underpin successful screening. This review examines the critical role of tandem mass spectrometry, sample integrity protocols, and the establishment of robust cutoff values. Furthermore, this review explores persistent challenges such as false-positive and false-negative results, ethical and logistical hurdles in global implementation, and the transformative potential of recent advancements, including the integration of genomics and high-resolution metabolomics. In addition, this review explores the future of the program, highlighting the transformative potential of high-resolution metabolomics and the integration of genomic sequencing to ensure early diagnosis and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.