ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
The Variation in IRT in Different Ethnic Groups in England-Implications for a Newborn Screening Programme for CF in Diverse Multiethnic Populations.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing ethnic diversity raises potential inequalities within screening programmes. In the UK, newborns are screened for CF by initially measuring IRT. Dried blood spot IRT levels above a set cut-off require follow-up testing to establish a screening result. Variation exists in IRT levels between different ethnicities and therefore impacts the number of potentially false positive results obtained from ethnic groups. Over a 4-year period, IRT data was collected, and the 99.5th centile was calculated for different ethnic groups. Significant differences were noticed between ethnic groups, and the CF outcome data over a 10-year period were then analysed to establish the effect this had on positive predictive values. The largest difference in IRT 99.5th centile values was seen between the White British and Black African groups. Positive predictive values for Black African and Indian ethnic groups were much lower than the other groups. Rather than try to incorporate ethnicity into the UK CF screening algorithm, we suggest making CF clinicians aware of the differences between different ethnic groups to inform counselling families who receive screen-positive results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.