ArticlePain research & management2026
Attitudes Toward Vital Signs Assessment as a Predictor of Attitudes Toward Pain Assessment Among Nursing Students With Clinical Practice Experience.
Article in Pain research & management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attitudes Toward Vital Signs Assessment as a Predictor of Attitudes Toward Pain Assessment Among Nursing Students With Clinical Practice Experience.Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to examine nursing students' attitudes toward vital signs assessment and pain assessment by demographic characteristics and to identify the effect of attitudes toward vital signs assessment on attitudes toward pain assessment as well as the predictors of attitudes toward pain assessment.
methodsA descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study was conducted between March and June 2025 with 332 second-, third-, and fourth-year nursing students who had clinical practice experience. Data were collected using a Sociodemographic Information Form, the Attitudes Towards Vital Signs Monitoring Scale-Turkish Version (V-Scale-TR), and the Nursing Students' Attitudes Scale Toward Pain Assessment (NSASPA). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analyses.
resultsA moderate positive correlation was found between nursing students' attitudes toward vital signs assessment and their attitudes toward pain assessment (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that demographic variables and attitudes toward vital signs assessment together explained 43.5% of the variance in attitudes toward pain assessment (R
conclusionsMore positive attitudes toward vital signs assessment were associated with more positive attitudes toward pain assessment. These findings suggest that competence and awareness in vital signs monitoring may enhance nursing students' sensitivity, empathy, and clinical judgment in pain assessment. IMPLICATIONS FOR AN INTERNATIONAL AUDIENCE: Integrating evidence-based education on vital signs assessment and pain assessment into undergraduate nursing curricula may improve nursing students' critical thinking skills, empathy, and overall quality of patient care across diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.