ArticleMuscles (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effects of Resistance Respiratory Training on Respiratory Muscle Strength in Healthy Active Individuals.
Article in Muscles (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespiratory muscle strength (RMS) is a critical factor influencing athletic performance, particularly in high-intensity or prolonged activities. RMS encompasses inspiratory (IMs) and expiratory muscles (EMs), which differ in anatomical structure, fiber composition, and responsiveness to training.
methodsThis pilot interventional within-subject study investigated the effects of two resistive respiratory muscle training (RMT) protocols on RMS and small airway function in eight physically active adults (two females, six males). Maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory pressures (MEP), along with pulmonary function tests (PFTs), were measured using the Airofit PRO™ device and spirometry before and after two consecutive 7-day training protocols, with a 2-day break between interventions. The workload was progressively increased by lengthening the duration of forced inhalation and exhalation, while keeping the air resistance constant.
resultsResults demonstrated significant improvements in MEP across both protocols and after a 10-day washout period (
conclusionsThese outcomes suggest differential responsiveness of respiratory muscles to RMT; EMs, characterized by a higher proportion of fast-twitch type II fibers and a predominantly passive role in normal breathing, respond rapidly to short-duration, high-intensity forced expiration training through neuromuscular adaptations. Conversely, IMs, dominated by slow-twitch type I fibers, require longer-duration, higher-load training to elicit meaningful adaptations, explaining the limited changes in MIP. Small airway function appeared minimally trainable due to structural and physiological constraints, with short-term improvements likely reflecting effort-dependent factors rather than lasting adaptations. Finally, RMT can selectively enhance EM performance through appropriately designed short-duration, high-intensity interventions, while IMs may necessitate prolonged or higher-load stimuli. The findings highlight the importance of targeted training strategies, individualized to muscle fiber composition and functional demands, to optimize respiratory performance. Future research should investigate longer interventions, larger diverse cohorts, and precise measurement methods to further elucidate RMT's effects on both respiratory muscles and small airway function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.