ReviewAudiology research2026
Effects of Hearing Intervention on Cognitive Function in Patients with Presbycusis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Audiology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to systematically assess the impact of hearing interventions on cognitive function in older adults with presbycusis.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases from their inception to 22 June 2025 to identify eligible randomized clinical trials or cohort studies that used designated cognitive scales or cognitive test measures. Two separate meta-analyses were conducted: one using uncontrolled pre-post comparisons and another restricted to studies that included concurrent untreated control groups.
resultsA total of 22 studies were identified, comprising 9 focused on hearing aid use and 13 on cochlear implantation. Ultimately, 19 studies were included in the quantitative analysis: 7 on hearing aid use and 12 on cochlear implantation. The pooled analysis of hearing intervention across 17 studies involving 1562 patients indicated a 4% improvement in cognitive test scores post-intervention compared with pre-intervention (ratio of means: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03-1.05;
conclusionsCurrent controlled evidence does not support the claim that hearing interventions preserve or enhance cognitive function in older adults with presbycusis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.