ArticleEuropean burn journal2026
Japanese Consensus Document on NexoBrid
Article in European burn journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Japanese Consensus Document on NexoBridEuropean burn journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNexoBrid
methodsA questionnaire-based survey was conducted using the Delphi method to achieve expert consensus. Consensus was defined as agreement by at least 80% of committee members for each statement. A total of 27 statements were evaluated over two rounds.
resultsConsensus was achieved for 20 of 27 statements (74.1%) in the first round and for 21 of 27 statements (77.8%) in the second round. The finalised statements were organised into seven categories according to their attributes: indications, pain management, application timing, application technique, post-application wound care, skin grafting, and scarring/aesthetic outcomes.
conclusionsThis consensus document integrates the opinions of plastic surgeons and emergency physicians in Japan, while also incorporating relevant international perspectives, to provide practical guidance on the use of NXB for burn treatment. It is intended to improve the quality of burn care by clarifying efficacy, safety, and precautions associated with NXB use. These recommendations should be updated as further clinical experience accumulates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.