ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The 5% Problem: How the Biomedical Community Responded to the Animal-to-Human Translation Crisis, and the Case for Non-Animal Methods.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a central driver of change across the drug development lifecycle. However, its integration is evolving so rapidly that it remains essential to understand how these technologies are currently positioned within the field. Because reliable access to high-quality (effective and safe) drugs is essential to public health, the pharmaceutical product lifecycle (PPL) offers a coherent framework for evaluating how AI can enhance evidence and data creation across all stages. To understand where AI genuinely adds value, this review examines its contribution across the major stages of the PPL. Rather than treating drug discovery, nonclinical evaluation, clinical research, and post-marketing assessment as separate domains, we view them as a continuous chain of data, where digital technologies enhance different decision points in distinct ways. In early discovery, AI narrows the search space by integrating diverse datasets to prioritize candidates most likely to succeed. Nonclinical models increasingly rely on machine-learning systems designed to improve the human relevance of safety predictions. Within clinical trials, AI supports cohort formation, real-time monitoring, and new analytic strategies that supplement empirical evidence. Case studies from leading pharmaceutical companies illustrate that the most meaningful advances emerge when AI is embedded not as a standalone tool but as part of a broader data strategy that links information across stages. Taken together, current evidence suggests that AI is beginning to transform data generation and integration throughout the PPL. Given the accelerating pace of digital innovation, it is essential for the field to maintain continuous awareness of emerging methodologies and evolving regulatory frameworks to ensure that these technologies are implemented in a reliable, transparent, and scientifically grounded manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.