ArticleMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Test-Retest Reliability of a Performance-Based Test Battery in Patients with Fibromyalgia According to Socio-Occupational Status.
Article in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The value of performance-based tests in the assessment of patients with fibromyalgia: a construct validity and comprehensiveness analysis of a standardized test battery.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerformance-based tests (PBTs) objectively assess functional capacity and are increasingly applied in fibromyalgia (FM) to complement patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). However, evidence regarding their reliability, especially considering patients' socio-occupational status, is limited. This study aimed to determine test-retest reliability of a standardized PBT battery in women with FM and to examine the influence of employment status on measurement stability.
methodsA total of 119 women were assessed (89 with FM). The battery included the 6 min walk test (6MWT), handgrip strength test (HST), and 8 feet up and go test (8FUGT). Test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest real difference (SRD). Analyses were conducted for the total FM group and socio-occupational subgroups (actively working, claiming disability, and permanent disability).
resultsAll PBTs demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability. Measurement stability was consistently higher in controls. Absolute reliability indices confirmed acceptable measurement stability. However, the claiming disability group showed markedly higher SEM% and SRD% for HST, suggesting reduced reproducibility. The 6MWT and 8FUGT maintained excellent reliability and stability across all groups. PROMs showed good-to-excellent reliability.
conclusionsPBTs showed excellent reliability in women with FM. However, reliability varied across socio-occupational groups, particularly for HST in patients claiming disability. PROMSs showed lower reliability than PBTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.