Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42200953›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Differences in Opioid Prescribing by Urban and Rural Pharmacists in Nova Scotia, Canada-A Time Series Analysis from 2018 to 2022.

Edward Chisholm, Ying Zhang, Chiranjeev Sanyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward ChisholmDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada.
Chiranjeev SanyalCollege of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3677-8036

Funding

Dalhousie Pharmacy Endowment Fund 000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Health Canada temporarily exempted pharmacists from specific restrictions under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), allowing them to prescribe opioids. However, it is not yet established whether opioid dispensing patterns differ between urban and rural pharmacists. This study aims to assess the impact of the CDSA subsection 56(1) temporary exemption on opioid prescribing practices among urban and rural pharmacists between 1 February 2018 and 30 April 2022. Descriptive statistics and visualizations assessed differences in opioid prescribing between urban and rural pharmacists under the CDSA exemption. Initial analyses employed linear regression to examine changes, followed by evaluation of temporal dependence using autocorrelation and residual analysis. When appropriate, a suitable time series model was subsequently applied. Following the CDSA exemption, the mean weekly proportion of opioid claims prescribed by urban pharmacists increased from 0.0% to 1.03%. In contrast, rural pharmacists' prescriptions rose from 0.0% to 0.35%. The estimated mean level change was 0.667% for urban pharmacists (95% CI: 0.520-0.838%,

Indexed as

analgesicopioidspharmacistsruralscope of practiceurban

Identifiers

PMID42200953
PMCPMC13214799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.