ArticleJournal of eye movement research2026
Machine Learning Integration of Eye-Tracking and Cognitive Screening for Detecting Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is common in Post-COVID-19 Condition (PCC), yet full neuropsychological testing remains resource-intensive. Because eye movements are known to be altered in certain cognitive disorders, Eye-Tracking (ET) offers a fast, non-invasive complementary approach for large-scale screening. This study aimed to predict neuropsychological test scores of participants with PCC from ET metrics using machine and deep learning models. ET data was collected from 172 participants performing a battery of visual tasks designed to elicit smooth pursuit and fixational eye movements, as well as pupil responses to light. Cognitive performance was assessed through established neuropsychological tests. We applied regression and classification models (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost, and deep neural networks) to predict neuropsychological performance. Models were trained using ET data alone and in combination with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, a widely used neuropsychological test for global cognitive screening. Although predicting individual test scores was challenging, combining them into a global composite measure improved performance. Model sensitivity and specificity reached 88% and 34% using ET data alone, and 87% and 60% when integrating ET with MoCA. This last trained model outperformed the conventional MoCA, highlighting the potential of ET as a rapid screening support tool for cognitive assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.