Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42200926›Full record

ReviewJournal of eye movement research2026

Eye-Tracking-Based Interventions for School-Age Specific Learning Disorders: A Narrative Review of Functional Assessment and Gaze-Contingent Training.

Pierluigi Diotaiuti, Francesco Di Siena, Salvatore Vitiello, Alessandra Zanon, Pio Alfredo Di Tore, Stefania Mancone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pierluigi DiotaiutiDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5470-3233
Francesco Di SienaDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-8830-5606
Salvatore VitielloDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.
Alessandra ZanonDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.
Pio Alfredo Di ToreDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.
Stefania ManconeDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9837-526X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye tracking (ET) provides process-level indices of how students sample task-relevant information during core academic activities. In school-age learners (6-18 years) with specific learning disorders (SLDs; dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dyscalculia), ET can complement behavioural assessment by quantifying oculomotor patterns linked to decoding, model-production coordination, and stepwise strategy execution. This narrative review synthesises ET findings in SLD across reading, handwriting/copying, and arithmetic and translates them into an applied framework for school-oriented use. We summarise key metrics and Areas of Interest (AOI)-based analyses, highlight technical and data-quality requirements for valid acquisition in educational settings, and outline compact functional assessment protocols integrated with standard academic and neuropsychological measures. Building on these foundations, we propose six hypothesis-driven gaze-contingent paradigms (H1-H6) as preliminary models for future experimental testing rather than as established interventions, and we map each to its current level of empirical support, specifying primary gaze outcomes and curriculum-relevant behavioural endpoints. We emphasise that eye-movement findings in specific learning disorders are heterogeneous and may vary as a function of age, task demands, and comorbidity. Accordingly, credible training effects require retention and transfer probes under standard, non-contingent display conditions, appropriate controls, and explicit developmental interpretation. Eye tracking is positioned as complementary functional evidence and as a platform for experimentally testable, mechanism-based interventions in school-age specific learning disorders.

Indexed as

dyscalculiadysgraphiadyslexiaeye trackingfunctional assessmentgaze-contingent trainingoculomotor assessmentspecific learning disorders

Identifiers

PMID42200926
PMCPMC13214954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.