SynthesisInfant mental health journal2026
Activation parenting in mothers and fathers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Infant mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evolutionary-based theories of parenting, such as activation relationship theory, suggest that fathers may be more likely than mothers to engage in activation parenting, that is, interactions designed to stimulate and challenge children within acceptable limits. However, available evidence is mixed in identifying differences between mothers and fathers in activation parenting. Using two meta-analyses, we examined 1) mean differences and 2) associations in activation parenting exhibited by partnered mothers and fathers. The meta-analyses included 40 studies (38 unique samples, 76.3% collected in North America) with a total of 3,607 fathers and 3,707 mothers, and their children (M = 41.4 months; range = 3 months to 19.9 years). Most parents were white and from a mid-high socioeconomic status. The first meta-analysis showed that fathers displayed higher activation parenting than mothers, with a small effect size: g = .27, 95% CI [.17, .37], p < .001. Differences were larger in studies examining rough-and-tumble play. A strong correlation between partnered parents' activation parenting levels emerged in the second meta-analysis: r = .33, 95% CI [.19, .45], p < .001. These results highlight the importance of continuing research on activation parenting across diverse types of parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.