Observational studyMicrobiology spectrum2026
Detection of asymptomatic group A
Observational study in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize the frequency of asymptomatic group A IMPORTANCE: Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is an increasingly important respiratory pathogen, causing illnesses ranging from life-threatening infections to pharyngitis and asymptomatic carriage. The factors influencing GAS transmission remain poorly defined, and, in the absence of a GAS vaccine, identifying determinants that may guide outbreak-control strategies is essential. In this observational cross-sectional study, substantial asymptomatic carriage was observed among children and adults in daycare centers experiencing GAS outbreaks: 22% by throat culture and 41% by nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT). Co-detection of respiratory viruses was also common, and in one outbreak, enterovirus detection was more frequent among GAS-positive individuals. These findings provide preliminary insight into the complex dynamics of GAS transmission and highlight asymptomatic carriage and viral co-infections as potential intervention targets. However, the increased sensitivity of GAS NAATs compared with culture may complicate outbreak management by potentially driving unnecessary antimicrobial use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.