ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
Investigating virtual versus hands-on interventions in promoting increased performance, perceived knowledge, and confidence in a large general microbiology course.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active learning in face-to-face courses is superior to traditional lecturing, especially for women and marginalized students in STEM. Activities can be delivered using a broad variety of techniques, such as concept mapping, think-pair-share, and clickers. Concept modeling is particularly impactful for undergraduate biology courses, as they help students model microscopic organisms and processes that are otherwise impossible to visualize without microscopes or that occur on the molecular level. Generation Z, also known as iGen, is becoming one of the largest, most diverse demographics of students. iGen students grew up with technology and expect devices to be part of the learning experiences, which may begin to push hands-on manipulatives into a virtual format. However, it is unclear if the virtual format is universally beneficial for students. Thus, we investigated changes to students' performance, perceived knowledge, and confidence with the integration of eLearning activities, compared to interactive PowerPoint or hands-on activities. We sampled students in three sections of general microbiology over a semester as they completed six activities on historically difficult course topics. Each section received a different method of delivery (MOD) for their activities: PowerPoint, eLearning, or hands-on. Student performance on related quizzes and exam questions was also considered. Analyses included comparisons of marginalized and non-marginalized students to see if MOD impacted these groups of students differently. Overall, perceived knowledge, confidence, and performance all increased in response to the activities, with no significant differences among the three MODs. The data for marginalized students showed, however, that completing the hands-on MOD resulted in lower performance, perceived knowledge, and confidence. These findings suggest that there may be barriers for marginalized students when completing hands-on activities as compared to virtual activities in the face-to-face classroom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.