ArticleBlood advances2026
Clinical heterogeneity and outcome of acquired PRCA: a multicenter European study.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractPure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is a rare single-lineage bone marrow (BM) failure characterized by anemia with profound reticulocytopenia and severe reduction of erythroid precursors. PRCA is heterogeneous, and diagnosis requires extensive evaluation to distinguish primary from secondary causes, such as thymoma, autoimmune diseases, T-cell large granular lymphocyte expansion, and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the differential diagnosis of which is particularly challenging. Evidence guiding management remains limited because of the rarity of the disease and the lack of prospective studies. We analyzed 121 acquired adult PRCA (excluding Parvovirus B19-associated PRCA) cases across 14 European centers. Secondary forms accounted for 78% of diagnoses, mostly thymoma (23%) or MDS (21%). In a subset of patients, BM immunohistochemistry demonstrated significant depositions of C3, C4d, immunoglobulin M (IgM), and IgG, reducing after immunosuppression. Next-generation sequencing was performed in half of the patients, 36% of whom presented mutations predominantly related to clonal hematopoiesis, except in MDS-associated cases, which often carried multiple non-clonal hematopoiesis mutations. Immunosuppression represented the backbone of therapy: cyclosporine A (CyA) was the most effective agent, with 61% overall response rate (47% complete) and better outcomes when initiated earlier; mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) showed promising activity as second-line therapy, with responses in 71% of the patients, including CyA-refractory cases. Mortality reached 30%, predominantly because of infectious complications, and was significantly higher in MDS-associated cases. PRCA remains a diagnostically challenging and clinically heterogeneous disorder in which integration of molecular analyses may refine diagnostic accuracy and patient stratification. Immunosuppression remains the mainstay of treatment, with CyA being a reliable first-line treatment and mTORi emerging as encouraging rescue options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.