ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Consumption of four unhealthy commodities and exposure to advertising, sponsorship, and promotion in Bamako, Mali.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death and disability globally and risks for many NCDs are associated with commercial determinants of health for tobacco, alcohol, ultra-processed foods (UPFs), and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). Our aim was to understand reported consumption patterns of these four commodities along with reported exposure to advertising, promotion, and sponsorship (APS), focusing on vulnerable groups including young adults (18-24), less wealthy (quintiles 1 and 2), and women. We conducted a systematic randomized household survey of adults at two sites in Bamako, Mali to collect socio-demographic factors and measure reported consumption and exposure to APS for the commodities. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed χ2 tests to assess differences by three vulnerable groups. We surveyed 984 participants and found high reported consumption of SSBs (78%) and UPFs (67%) at least once per week, together with low reported current tobacco use (11%) and low reported alcohol use (1%) in the past 30 days. More than half of participants reported exposure to APS in the past 30 days for SSBs (76%) and UPFs (57%) while tobacco and alcohol reported exposure was lower (38% each). Young adults had higher reported consumption of SSBs and UPFs and higher reported APS exposure for both commodities compared with older groups. Systems-level interventions are recommended including increasing the SSB tax, adding a UPF tax, and strengthening enforcement of the APS ban for tobacco. These findings suggest further research on the usefulness of an APS ban for SSBs and UPFs targeted to young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.