ArticleeLife2026
High-frequency spike inference with particle Gibbs sampling.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precise calcium-to-spike inference using biophysical generative models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Precise calcium-to-spike inference using biophysical generative models.Research square · 2025Article
- Automatic monitoring of neural activity with single-cell resolution in behaving Hydra.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Automatic monitoring of whole-body neural activity in behavingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Calcium-sensitive fluorescent indicators enable monitoring of spiking activity in large neuronal populations in animal models. Despite the plethora of algorithms developed over the past decades, accurate spike-time inference methods for spike rates exceeding 20 Hz are lacking. More importantly, little attention has been devoted to the quantification of statistical uncertainties in spike time estimation, which is essential for assigning confidence levels to inferred spike patterns. To address these challenges, we introduce (1) a statistical model that accounts for bursting neuronal activity and baseline fluorescence modulation and (2) apply a Monte Carlo strategy (particle Gibbs with ancestor sampling) to estimate the joint posterior distribution of spike times and model parameters. Our method is competitive with state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised algorithms, as evaluated on the CASCADE benchmark datasets. Analysis of fluorescence transients recorded with the ultrafast genetically encoded calcium indicator GCaMP8f demonstrates that our method can resolve interspike intervals as short as 5 ms. Overall, our study describes a Bayesian inference method for detecting neuronal spiking patterns and quantifying their uncertainty. The use of particle Gibbs samplers enables unbiased estimates of spike times and all model parameters, providing a flexible statistical framework for testing more specific models of calcium indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.